Home / IGCSE Mathematics 0580 / Ratio and proportion
Cambridge IGCSE Mathematics 0580 · Number

Ratio and proportion

How to write a ratio in its simplest form, share an amount in a given ratio, and use proportional reasoning in context: adapting recipes, working with map scales, deciding which pack is the best value, and spotting when two quantities are in inverse proportion.

C1.11E1.11Core and ExtendedFree lesson
What the syllabus says

C1.11 (Core)

  • Understand and use ratio and proportion to:
  • give ratios in their simplest form
  • divide a quantity in a given ratio
  • use proportional reasoning and ratios in context.

Notes and examples

  • e.g. 20 : 30 : 40 in its simplest form is 2 : 3 : 4.
  • e.g. adapt recipes; use map scales; determine best value.

E1.11 (Extended)

  • Understand and use ratio and proportion to:
  • give ratios in their simplest form
  • divide a quantity in a given ratio
  • use proportional reasoning and ratios in context.

Notes and examples

  • e.g. 20 : 30 : 40 in its simplest form is 2 : 3 : 4.
  • e.g. adapt recipes; use map scales; determine best value.

Quoted from the Cambridge IGCSE Mathematics 0580 syllabus for 2025 to 2027.

What a ratio tells you

A ratio compares the sizes of two or more quantities. If a fruit bowl holds 3 apples for every 5 oranges, the ratio of apples to oranges is 3:5. It does not say how many pieces of fruit there are, only how they compare: 6 apples and 10 oranges, or 30 apples and 50 oranges, are both in the ratio 3:5.

Three ideas sit underneath every ratio question:

  • Order matters. Apples to oranges is 3:5; oranges to apples is 5:3. Write the parts in the order the question names them.
  • A ratio gives you fractions of the whole. In 3:5 there are 3+5=8 parts altogether, so the apples are 38 of the fruit and the oranges are 58. Writing 35 for the fraction of apples is a very common slip: 35 compares apples with oranges, not apples with all the fruit.
  • A ratio has no units, so the quantities must be in the same units. You can compare 45 minutes with 2 hours, but only after writing both in minutes.

Writing a ratio in its simplest form

A ratio is in its simplest form when every part is a whole number and the parts have no common factor other than 1. Dividing every part by the same number does not change the ratio, for the same reason that 68=34: each part keeps exactly the same share of the whole.

The quickest route is to divide every part by the highest common factor (HCF). The syllabus gives the example 20:30:40. The HCF of 20, 30 and 40 is 10, so 20:30:40=2:3:4. If you cannot spot the HCF straight away, divide by any common factor you can see and keep going until no common factor is left.

Two awkward cases come up often:

  • Decimals or fractions in the ratio. Multiply every part by the same number to clear them, then simplify. 1.5:2.5 becomes 15:25 (multiply by 10), which is 3:5. For 12:23, multiply by 6, the lowest common multiple of the denominators, to get 3:4.
  • Different units. Convert to one unit first. 45 minutes : 2 hours is 45:120, which simplifies to 3:8. Writing 45:2 compares minutes with hours and is simply wrong.

Some questions ask for the form 1:n, which is how map scales are written. Divide every part by the first part: 8:20=1:2.5. In this form n is allowed to be a decimal; that is the point of it.

Worked example 1

Write 1.2 kg:450 g in its simplest form.

  1. The units are different, so change both to grams: 1.2 kg=1200 g.

  2. The ratio is now 1200:450.

  3. Both parts divide by 10, giving 120:45, and then by 15, giving 8:3.

  4. 8 and 3 have no common factor other than 1, so this is the simplest form. (Dividing 1200:450 by its HCF, 150, gets there in one step.)

Answer: 8:3

Check yourself

Write 36:48:60 in its simplest form.

Answer it in the portal, where your answer is checked as you type →

Dividing a quantity in a given ratio

To share an amount in a given ratio, think in parts:

  1. Add the numbers in the ratio to find the total number of parts.
  2. Divide the amount by the total number of parts to find the value of one part.
  3. Multiply the value of one part by each number in the ratio.
  4. Check that the shares add up to the amount you started with.

Why it works: in the ratio 2:5, the first person receives 2 parts for every 5 parts the second receives. Out of every 7 parts handed out, 2 go to the first person, so their share is 27 of the total. Steps 2 and 3 are just a tidy way of finding 27 of the amount.

Questions do not always give you the total. You may be told one person's share, or the difference between two shares. Then work out how many parts that number represents, find one part from it, and carry on as before. The question to ask every time is: how many parts is the number I have been given worth?

Worked example 2

Share £84 between Asha and Ben in the ratio 2:5.

  1. Total number of parts: 2+5=7.

  2. One part is worth 84÷7=12, so £12.

  3. Asha receives 2×12=24, so £24. Ben receives 5×12=60, so £60.

  4. Check: 24+60=84.

Answer: Asha £24, Ben £60

Worked example 3 (exam style)

The marbles in a bag are red, blue and green in the ratio 4:7:2. There are 15 more blue marbles than red marbles. How many marbles are in the bag altogether?

  1. The 15 is a difference, not a total. Blue minus red is 7−4=3 parts.

  2. So 3 parts are 15 marbles, and one part is 15÷3=5 marbles.

  3. There are 4+7+2=13 parts altogether, so the bag holds 13×5=65 marbles.

  4. Check: red 20, blue 35, green 10. Blue minus red is 15, and 20+35+10=65.

Answer: 65 marbles

Check yourself

Share 270 g of flour in the ratio 4:5. Find the larger share.

Answer it in the portal, where your answer is checked as you type →

Proportional reasoning: recipes and the unitary method

Two quantities are in direct proportion when they change at the same rate: double one and the other doubles, halve one and the other halves. The ingredients in a recipe behave like this, and so does the cost of fuel against the number of litres bought.

There are two reliable methods:

  • Scale factor. A recipe for 4 people uses 300 g of rice. For 10 people the scale factor is 10÷4=2.5, so you need 300×2.5=750 g.
  • Unitary method. Find the amount for one, then multiply. 300 g for 4 people is 300÷4=75 g per person, so 10 people need 75×10=750 g.

The unitary method always works; the scale factor is quicker when the numbers are friendly. What does not work is adding: going from 4 people to 10 people is not adding 6 lots of anything to 300 g.

Some quantities go the other way. If 4 painters take 6 days to paint a building, then 8 painters working at the same rate take 3 days: doubling the workers halves the time. This is inverse proportion. What stays fixed is the product: the job needs 4×6=24 painter-days however you split it. So find that total first, then divide by the new number of painters or days.

Before you calculate, ask: should the answer be bigger or smaller? More people eating needs more rice; more people working needs fewer days. That one question catches most errors. And think about whether the answer must be a whole number, and which way to round: you cannot bake part of a biscuit, so if you have enough butter for 26.7 biscuits, you can make 26.

Worked example 4

A recipe for 12 pancakes uses 180 g of flour and 300 ml of milk. (a) How much flour is needed for 20 pancakes? (b) Leo has 750 ml of milk and plenty of everything else. What is the greatest number of pancakes he can make?

  1. (a) Unitary method: one pancake needs 180÷12=15 g of flour.

  2. 20 pancakes need 15×20=300 g of flour.

  3. (b) One pancake needs 300÷12=25 ml of milk.

  4. 750 ml is enough for 750÷25=30 pancakes. Milk is the only limit, so 30 is the greatest number.

Answer: (a) 300 g (b) 30 pancakes

Map scales

A map scale is a ratio. A scale of 1:50000 means that 1 cm on the map represents 50000 cm on the ground. A ratio has no units, so both parts are in the same unit: you work in centimetres and convert at the end.

The conversions you need: 100 cm = 1 m and 1000 m = 1 km, so 100000 cm = 1 km.

  • Map to real: multiply by the scale number, then convert. 6 cm on a 1:50000 map is 6×50000=300000 cm, which is 3000 m, or 3 km.
  • Real to map: convert the real distance into centimetres, then divide by the scale number. 4.5 km is 450000 cm, and 450000÷50000=9 cm.

A good habit is to say the scale in words before you start. 1:50000 means 1 cm stands for 500 m, so 2 cm stands for 1 km. Saying it this way also tells you whether your final answer is sensible: a 9 cm line on this map cannot be 45 km long.

Worked example 5

A map has a scale of 1:200000. (a) Two towns are 7.5 cm apart on the map. Find the real distance between them in kilometres. (b) A lake is 9 km long. How long is the lake on the map?

  1. (a) Real distance in cm: 7.5×200000=1500000 cm.

  2. Divide by 100 for metres: 15000 m. Divide by 1000 for kilometres: 15 km.

  3. (b) Change 9 km into centimetres: 9×100000=900000 cm.

  4. Map length: 900000÷200000=4.5 cm.

Answer: (a) 15 km (b) 4.5 cm

Check yourself

A map has a scale of 1:40000. A footpath is 12 cm long on the map. How long is the real footpath, in kilometres?

Answer it in the portal, where your answer is checked as you type →

Best value

To decide which of several packs is the best value, compare like with like. There are two standard methods:

  • Price per unit: divide the price by the amount, for example the cost of 1 kg or of 100 ml. The smallest price per unit is the best value.
  • Amount per unit of money: divide the amount by the price, for example grams per £1. The largest amount per pound is the best value.

Either method earns full marks as long as you do the same calculation for every option, show each result, and then state which is best. An answer of just 'the large one' earns nothing, even when it is right, because the marks are for the comparison.

On a non-calculator paper, look for a convenient common amount instead. For 250 g at £1.50 and 400 g at £2.20, compare the cost of 50 g: 1.50÷5=0.30 and 2.20÷8=0.275. The 400 g pack is cheaper per 50 g, so it is the better value. Bigger packs are often, but not always, cheaper per unit, which is exactly why examiners set these questions.

Worked example 6

Rice is sold in three sizes: 500 g for £1.35, 2 kg for £4.90 and 5 kg for £12.75. Which size is the best value? Show your working.

  1. Find the price of 1 kg for each size.

  2. 500 g: two bags make 1 kg, so 1.35×2=2.70, which is £2.70 per kg.

  3. 2 kg: 4.90÷2=2.45, which is £2.45 per kg.

  4. 5 kg: 12.75÷5=2.55, which is £2.55 per kg.

  5. £2.45 is the lowest price per kilogram, so the 2 kg bag is the best value. Notice that the biggest bag is not the cheapest per kilogram.

Answer: The 2 kg bag (£2.45 per kg)

Key points

  • Simplest form: same units first, clear any decimals or fractions, then divide every part by the HCF.

  • In a:b the fractions of the whole are aa+b and ba+b.

  • Sharing: total parts, then one part, then each share. Check the shares add up to the total.

  • If you are given one share or a difference, work out how many parts it represents and find one part from that.

  • Direct proportion: use a scale factor or the unitary method. Inverse proportion: find the fixed total (such as worker-days) first, then divide.

  • Map scale 1:n: 1 cm on the map is n cm in real life, and 100000 cm = 1 km.

  • Best value: the same calculation for every option, every result shown, and a clear conclusion.

Where marks are lost

  • Dividing the amount by one number in the ratio instead of by the total number of parts.

  • Treating a difference between shares as if it were one share or the total.

  • Writing a ratio with mixed units, such as 45:2 for 45 minutes : 2 hours.

  • Giving the parts in the wrong order. Read which quantity the question names first.

  • Leaving a ratio as 1:2.5:4 or 10:25:40 when the simplest whole-number form is asked for.

  • Map scales: leaving the answer in centimetres, or dividing by 1000 instead of 100000 to get kilometres.

  • Treating an inverse proportion as direct: more workers do not take more days.

  • Best value: stating the answer without showing the comparison, or comparing different amounts.

  • Rounding the wrong way in context: if there is only enough butter for 26.7 biscuits, the answer is 26.

Related IGCSE Mathematics 0580 lessons

All IGCSE Mathematics 0580 lessons →

An original lesson written to the Cambridge IGCSE Mathematics 0580 syllabus (2025 to 2027). The worked examples and questions are our own, not Cambridge questions. Back to every IGCSE Mathematics 0580 lesson.