Home / CIE 9701 Chemistry / Chemistry of transition elements
CIE 9701 Chemistry · A Level · Topic 28

Chemistry of transition elements

Clear, syllabus-mapped CIE 9701 Chemistry revision notes on chemistry of transition elements: explanations, worked examples and exam technique, then a free targeted practice drill.

CIE 9701 ChemistryA LevelFree revision notes
Contents: 11 sections

All five subtopics here are printed under "A Level subject content" in the 9701 syllabus, and every objective carries the tier "A Level". None of it is AS. It is examined on Paper 4. Paper 1 is the AS multiple-choice paper and the whole 9701 bank on this site comes from it, so no practice here is tagged to this topic.

With twenty-seven objectives this is the largest topic in the A Level chemistry course. Everything in it follows from one structural fact, that the 3d and 4s subshells are close in energy and the 3d subshell is only partly filled, so it is worth reading the first section carefully before the rest.

Syllabus points

28.1 General physical and chemical properties of the first row of transition elements, titanium to copper

28.2 General characteristic chemical properties of the first set of transition elements, titanium to copper

28.3 Colour of complexes

28.4 Stereoisomerism in transition element complexes

28.5 Stability constants, K_stab

What a transition element is

A transition element is a d-block element which forms one or more stable ions with an incomplete d subshell.

The definition is worded that way to exclude two elements that sit in the d block and are not transition elements:

Neither has an ion with a partly filled d subshell, so neither shows the characteristic properties. Being asked why zinc is not a transition element is a standard question and the answer is exactly that.

Two electron configurations are irregular and must be learned, in each case because a half-filled or a full 3d subshell is more stable than the arrangement with a filled 4s.

When a transition element forms an ion, the 4s electrons are lost first, before the 3d. So Fe is 3d⁶4s² and Fe²⁺ is 3d⁶, not 3d⁴4s².

The shapes of the d orbitals

Two must be sketched.

The difference between them is the reason the orbitals split in a complex, so the sketches are not decoration.

The four characteristic properties, and why

All four come from the same source: the 3d and 4s subshells are very close in energy, and the 3d subshell is only partly filled with vacant orbitals available.

Variable oxidation states. Because 3d and 4s are similar in energy, the energy needed to remove a 3d electron is not much greater than for a 4s electron, so different numbers of electrons can be lost without a large energy penalty. Manganese runs from +2 to +7. Contrast a Group 2 metal, where removing a third electron means breaking into an inner shell and is prohibitively costly.

Catalytic behaviour. Two mechanisms, and the syllabus wants both:

Complex ion formation. The vacant, energetically accessible d orbitals can accept lone pairs from ligands to form dative covalent bonds.

Coloured compounds. Explained in section 28.3 below.

Complexes and ligands

Type of ligandBonds formed per ligandExamples
Monodentate1H₂O, NH₃, Cl⁻, CN⁻
Bidentate21,2-diaminoethane (en), ethanedioate C₂O₄²⁻
Polydentate6 for EDTAEDTA⁴⁻

So [Ni(en)₃]²⁺ has three ligands but a coordination number of six, and [Cu(EDTA)]²⁻ has one ligand and a coordination number of six.

Shapes

Coordination numberShapeBond angleExample
2Linear180°[Ag(NH₃)₂]⁺
4Tetrahedral109.5°[CuCl₄]²⁻
4Square planar90°[Pt(NH₃)₂Cl₂]
6Octahedral90°[Cu(H₂O)₆]²⁺

The useful rule of thumb is that small ligands such as water and ammonia give six-coordinate octahedral complexes, while large ligands such as chloride give four-coordinate tetrahedral ones, because only four of the larger ligands fit around the metal ion.

Working out the charge on a complex

The overall charge is the oxidation state of the metal plus the sum of the charges on the ligands.

Worked examples.

Ligand exchange, with the colours

Ligand exchange is the replacement of one ligand by another in a complex, and it usually changes the colour and sometimes the shape. The copper(II) and cobalt(II) series must be known.

Copper(II)

ComplexColourShape
[Cu(H₂O)₆]²⁺Pale blue solutionOctahedral
Cu(OH)₂Pale blue precipitateSolid
[Cu(NH₃)₄(H₂O)₂]²⁺Deep blue solutionOctahedral
[CuCl₄]²⁻Yellow solutionTetrahedral

Adding a little aqueous ammonia to copper(II) sulfate solution gives the pale blue precipitate of copper(II) hydroxide, because ammonia acts as a base. Adding excess ammonia dissolves the precipitate to give the deep blue solution, because ammonia now acts as a ligand and replaces four of the six water molecules. Being able to explain the same reagent doing two different things is a favourite question, and the answer is that ammonia is both a base and a ligand.

Adding concentrated hydrochloric acid replaces all six water molecules with four chloride ions, so both the colour and the shape change, from octahedral to tetrahedral. The change is reversible: adding water turns the yellow solution blue again.

Cobalt(II)

ComplexColourShape
[Co(H₂O)₆]²⁺Pink solutionOctahedral
Co(OH)₂Blue precipitate turning pink on standingSolid
[Co(NH₃)₆]²⁺Straw or pale brown solution, darkening in airOctahedral
[CoCl₄]²⁻Blue solutionTetrahedral

The pink to blue change on adding concentrated hydrochloric acid is the one to remember, and it reverses on dilution.

Note the pattern across both: water and ammonia are similar in size, so an exchange between them keeps the octahedral shape, whereas chloride is much larger, so an exchange to chloride reduces the coordination number to four and the shape to tetrahedral.

Why complexes are coloured

Degenerate orbitals are orbitals of equal energy. In an isolated gaseous ion the five 3d orbitals are degenerate.

When ligands approach, their lone pairs repel the d electrons, and they repel some d orbitals more than others because the orbitals point in different directions. So the five orbitals split into two non-degenerate sets separated by an energy gap ΔE:

The colour then arises in three steps:

  1. An electron absorbs energy from visible light and is promoted from the lower set to the higher set.
  2. The energy absorbed equals ΔE, and the frequency absorbed is given by ΔE = hf, so only light of that frequency is absorbed.
  3. The light transmitted or reflected is the original white light minus the absorbed frequency, so the colour seen is the complementary colour of the light absorbed.

That is why a compound with an empty or a full d subshell is colourless: there is no electron to promote, or no vacancy to promote it into. Sc³⁺, Zn²⁺ and Cu⁺ are all colourless, and this is the neatest evidence that the colour comes from d-d transitions.

What changes ΔE. Different ligands split the d orbitals by different amounts, and so do a different oxidation state of the metal and a different coordination number.

Two lines carry most of the marks in an explanation question: name the d-d transition between non-degenerate orbitals, and say that the observed colour is the complementary colour of the frequency absorbed.

Stereoisomerism in complexes

Geometrical (cis/trans) isomerism occurs where two identical ligands can be arranged adjacent or opposite:

Optical isomerism occurs where a complex has no plane of symmetry, so it exists as two non-superimposable mirror images. It arises most often with bidentate ligands:

Polarity

The trans isomer of a square planar complex such as [Pt(NH₃)₂Cl₂] is non-polar: the two identical ligands are opposite one another, so the bond dipoles cancel. The cis isomer is polar, because the two chlorides are on the same side and the dipoles reinforce rather than cancel.

The same reasoning applies to an octahedral complex with two identical ligands: trans cancels, cis does not.

Redox reactions of transition elements

Because transition elements have several oxidation states, they take part in redox reactions, and the feasibility of any of them is judged from E° values exactly as in topic 24: the reaction is feasible if E°_cell is positive.

Three systems must be known.

Manganate(VII) and iron(II) in acid.

MnO₄⁻ + 8H⁺ + 5Fe²⁺ → Mn²⁺ + 4H₂O + 5Fe³⁺

The ratio is 1 mole of MnO₄⁻ to 5 moles of Fe²⁺. The manganate(VII) is self-indicating: the purple colour is decolourised until the end point, at which the first permanent faint pink appears. Use dilute sulfuric acid to acidify, never hydrochloric, since chloride would itself be oxidised, and never nitric, since it is an oxidising agent.

Manganate(VII) and ethanedioate in acid.

2MnO₄⁻ + 16H⁺ + 5C₂O₄²⁻ → 2Mn²⁺ + 8H₂O + 10CO₂

The ratio is 2 : 5. This reaction is slow at first and then speeds up, because the Mn²⁺ produced catalyses it, which is an example of autocatalysis and a good illustration of a transition element's two oxidation states at work.

Copper(II) and iodide.

2Cu²⁺ + 4I⁻ → 2CuI + I₂

Copper(II) oxidises iodide to iodine, and is itself reduced to a white precipitate of copper(I) iodide, so the mixture looks like a brown suspension. The iodine liberated is then titrated with sodium thiosulfate:

I₂ + 2S₂O₃²⁻ → 2I⁻ + S₄O₆²⁻

with starch added near the end point, when the colour has faded to pale straw, and the end point is the disappearance of the blue-black colour. The overall ratio is 2 moles of Cu²⁺ to 1 mole of I₂ to 2 moles of thiosulfate, so moles of thiosulfate equals moles of copper(II).

Worked example. 25.0 cm³ of a copper(II) solution liberates iodine that requires 22.4 cm³ of 0.100 mol dm⁻³ sodium thiosulfate. Find the concentration of the copper(II) solution.

Moles of thiosulfate:

22.4 × 0.100 / 1000 = 0.00224

Since moles of Cu²⁺ equals moles of thiosulfate, that is also 0.00224 mol in 25.0 cm³:

0.00224 × 1000 / 25.0 = 0.0896

so the concentration is 0.0896 mol dm⁻³.

Worked example, manganate(VII) and iron(II). 25.0 cm³ of an iron(II) solution requires 18.6 cm³ of 0.0200 mol dm⁻³ potassium manganate(VII).

Moles of MnO₄⁻:

18.6 × 0.0200 / 1000 = 0.000372

Moles of Fe²⁺, five times as many:

0.000372 × 5 = 0.00186

Concentration:

0.00186 × 1000 / 25.0 = 0.0744

so 0.0744 mol dm⁻³.

Stability constants

The stability constant K_stab of a complex is the equilibrium constant for the formation of the complex ion in a solvent from its constituent ions or molecules.

For a ligand exchange in aqueous solution, the water being displaced is the solvent and is present in vast excess, so [H₂O] is not included in the expression.

For [Cu(H₂O)₆]²⁺ + 4NH₃ ⇌ [Cu(NH₃)₄(H₂O)₂]²⁺ + 4H₂O:

K_stab = [[Cu(NH₃)₄(H₂O)₂]²⁺] / ([[Cu(H₂O)₆]²⁺] [NH₃]⁴)

A large K_stab means the equilibrium lies far to the right, so the complex formed is more stable than the aqua complex it replaced, and the substituting ligand binds more strongly. Comparing two K_stab values therefore predicts which ligand will displace the other: the ligand giving the larger K_stab wins.

Values are often very large, so they are frequently quoted as lg K_stab, and a difference of one unit in lg K_stab is a factor of ten in stability.

Bidentate and polydentate ligands give particularly large stability constants. EDTA⁴⁻ occupies all six coordination positions with a single ligand, which is why it is used to remove metal ions from solution, in water treatment, in analysis and as an antidote in cases of heavy-metal poisoning.

Worked example. For the reaction [Cu(H₂O)₆]²⁺ + EDTA⁴⁻ ⇌ [Cu(EDTA)]²⁻ + 6H₂O, K_stab = 6.3 × 10¹⁸. At equilibrium [[Cu(EDTA)]²⁻] = 0.0100 mol dm⁻³ and [EDTA⁴⁻] = 0.0500 mol dm⁻³. Find the concentration of free aqua copper(II) ions.

Rearranging the expression:

0.0100 / (6.3 × 10¹⁸ × 0.0500) = 3.175 × 10⁻²⁰

so about 3.2 × 10⁻²⁰ mol dm⁻³, which is effectively zero. That is what a large stability constant means in practice.

Common mistakes

Related CIE 9701 Chemistry topics

Browse all CIE 9701 Chemistry revision notes →