Home / CIE 9700 Biology / Genetic technology
CIE 9700 Biology · A Level · Topic 19

Genetic technology

Clear, syllabus-mapped CIE 9700 Biology revision notes on genetic technology: explanations, worked examples and exam technique, then a free targeted practice drill.

CIE 9700 BiologyA LevelFree revision notes
Contents: 14 sections

Every objective in this topic is printed under "A Level subject content" in the 9700 syllabus, so all of it is A Level and none of it is AS. It is examined on Paper 4. Paper 1 is the AS multiple-choice paper and does not reach this topic, so no multiple-choice practice on this site is tagged to it.

Syllabus points

19.1 Principles of genetic technology

19.2 Genetic technology applied to medicine

19.3 Genetically modified organisms in agriculture

Recombinant DNA and genetic engineering

Recombinant DNA is DNA made by joining together lengths of DNA from two different organisms, or from two different sources.

Genetic engineering is the deliberate manipulation of genetic material to modify the characteristics of an organism. Usually that means transferring a gene into an organism so that the gene is expressed, meaning transcribed and translated, so the organism makes the protein.

The whole field rests on one fact from topic 6: the genetic code is universal. The same triplet codes for the same amino acid in a bacterium, a plant and a human, so a human gene put into a bacterium produces a human protein. Without that, none of this would work.

An organism that has had a gene from another species inserted is transgenic, and it is a genetically modified organism (GMO).

Getting hold of the gene

Three routes are on the syllabus.

The enzymes and the vector

ComponentRole
Restriction endonucleaseCuts DNA at a specific recognition sequence, often leaving sticky ends, short single-stranded overhangs
DNA ligaseJoins the sugar-phosphate backbones of two DNA fragments, forming phosphodiester bonds
PlasmidA small circular DNA molecule from a bacterium, used as a vector to carry the gene into the host cell
DNA polymeraseSynthesises a complementary DNA strand from a template, used to make cDNA double stranded and used in PCR
Reverse transcriptaseSynthesises DNA from an RNA template

The reason sticky ends matter is worth stating rather than assuming. If the same restriction enzyme is used to cut both the donor DNA and the plasmid, both carry the same complementary overhangs, so the gene and the plasmid base-pair with each other by hydrogen bonding. Ligase then seals the joins permanently. Cutting with two different enzymes would give ends that do not match.

The plasmid is then taken up by a bacterium, usually after treatment with calcium ions and heat shock, or by electroporation, which makes the membrane temporarily permeable.

Why a promoter is needed too

A gene is only transcribed if RNA polymerase can bind upstream of it. The promoter is that binding site. A human gene inserted into a bacterium carries a human promoter, which bacterial RNA polymerase does not recognise, so the gene sits there and is never transcribed.

A promoter that the host recognises must therefore be transferred with the gene. Choosing the promoter also lets engineers control where and when the gene is expressed, which matters in a plant where you may want a protein in the seed but not in the leaf.

Marker genes

After transformation, only a small proportion of cells will have taken up the plasmid, and you need to identify them.

A marker gene is included in the plasmid alongside the gene of interest. Modern practice uses genes coding for fluorescent products, such as green fluorescent protein (GFP) from a jellyfish. Cells that have taken up the plasmid express GFP and glow green under ultraviolet light; cells that have not do not glow, and are discarded.

Because the marker is expressed only when the plasmid is present and being transcribed, fluorescence confirms not just uptake but expression. Fluorescent markers have largely replaced antibiotic-resistance markers, and the reason is a good exam point: releasing bacteria carrying antibiotic-resistance genes risks that resistance spreading to pathogens.

Gene editing

Gene editing is a form of genetic engineering in which DNA is inserted, deleted or replaced at a specific site in the genome, rather than a gene being added at a random position.

This is the important difference. Classical genetic engineering adds a gene wherever the vector happens to integrate, which may disrupt another gene. Editing targets a chosen sequence, so a faulty allele can be corrected in place, and the edited organism may contain no foreign DNA at all when the change is complete.

The polymerase chain reaction

PCR makes millions of copies of a specific length of DNA from a very small starting sample. One cycle has three steps, and it is repeated 25 to 35 times in a thermal cycler.

  1. Denaturation, about 95 °C. The hydrogen bonds between the two strands break, so the DNA separates into single strands. The covalent bonds of the backbone are unaffected.
  2. Annealing, about 55 to 65 °C. Short single-stranded primers base-pair with the ends of the target sequence. The primers define which stretch of DNA is amplified, and DNA polymerase cannot start without them.
  3. Extension, about 72 °C. Taq polymerase adds free DNA nucleotides to the 3' end of each primer, building a complementary strand along each template.

Taq polymerase comes from Thermus aquaticus, a bacterium of hot springs. Its significance is that it is thermostable: it is not denatured by the 95 °C denaturation step, so it does not have to be replaced every cycle, and its optimum of about 72 °C sets the extension temperature. Before Taq, fresh enzyme had to be added by hand at every cycle.

The amount of DNA doubles each cycle, so the growth is exponential.

Worked example. One DNA molecule is put through 20 cycles.

number of molecules = 2²⁰ = 1048576

so a single molecule becomes over a million copies. After 30 cycles:

number of molecules = 2³⁰ = 1073741824

This sensitivity is what makes PCR useful in forensic work, in diagnosing infections from tiny samples, and in amplifying DNA from ancient remains. It is also why contamination is such a problem: a stray cell from the person handling the sample amplifies just as readily.

Gel electrophoresis

Electrophoresis separates DNA fragments by length.

  1. Samples of DNA, usually cut with restriction enzymes, are placed in wells at one end of an agarose gel in a buffer solution.
  2. A voltage is applied across the gel.
  3. DNA is negatively charged, because of the phosphate groups in its backbone, so every fragment moves towards the positive electrode, the anode.
  4. The gel is a mesh. Shorter fragments move further in a given time because they pass through the mesh more easily; longer fragments are held back.
  5. The DNA is made visible by staining, or by using fluorescently labelled or radioactively labelled fragments and photographing the gel.

A DNA ladder of fragments of known length is run alongside, so the length of an unknown fragment can be read off by comparing how far it has travelled.

The key insight is that separation is by length only, since every fragment carries the same charge per unit length. That is why the charge on DNA never varies between fragments and cannot be the basis of separation.

Microarrays

A microarray is a slide carrying thousands of different single-stranded DNA probes, each of known sequence, fixed in a grid of spots.

Bioinformatics databases

Sequence databases hold the nucleotide sequences of genes and genomes and the amino acid sequences and structures of proteins. Their benefits:

Recombinant human proteins in medicine

ProteinConditionAdvantage of the recombinant version
InsulinDiabetesIdentical to human insulin, so no immune reaction and none of the allergy seen with pig or cattle insulin; unlimited supply; acceptable to those whose religion or ethics forbids animal products
Factor VIIIHaemophilia ANo risk of transmitting HIV or hepatitis, which infected haemophiliacs through donated blood products before recombinant factor VIII; supply not limited by blood donation
Adenosine deaminaseADA-SCIDAvailable at all, in a pure form, for a very rare condition where no natural source could supply it

The general advantages behind all three: large quantities can be produced, the protein is pure and exactly the human sequence so it works properly and provokes no immune response, and there is no risk of infection from a donor.

Genetic screening

Genetic screening tests an individual's DNA for particular alleles.

Advantages in general: earlier diagnosis and treatment, informed reproductive decisions, and identification of people who need monitoring.

Gene therapy

Gene therapy treats a genetic disease by inserting a functional allele into the patient's cells so the missing protein is made.

Note the distinction between somatic gene therapy, which treats body cells and is not inherited, and germ line therapy, which alters gametes or embryos and would be passed to all future generations. Germ line therapy is illegal in most countries.

Social and ethical considerations

The syllabus asks you to discuss, which means arguments on both sides and a judgement.

For genetic screening: it allows early treatment and monitoring; it allows people to make informed decisions about their own lives and about having children; it can reduce the incidence of severe inherited disease; and knowing is often better than not knowing.

Against: results are often probabilities rather than certainties and are easily misunderstood; a positive result can cause severe anxiety, particularly for an untreatable condition such as Huntington's disease; there is a risk of discrimination by insurers or employers; screening embryos raises questions about which lives are considered worth having, and about how far parental choice should extend; and confidentiality is complicated by the fact that a result tells you about your relatives too.

For gene therapy: it treats the cause rather than the symptoms; it offers the only prospect for some otherwise fatal conditions; and somatic therapy affects only the patient, who has consented.

Against: the effect may be short-lived if the treated cells do not divide, so treatment must be repeated; viral vectors carry risks, including provoking an immune response and inserting the gene where it disrupts another, which has caused leukaemia in past trials; the cost is very high, which raises questions of who gets access; and germ line therapy would change future generations who cannot consent, and opens the way to enhancement rather than treatment.

Genetically modified organisms in agriculture

Arguments for: higher yields from the same land, which matters as the population grows; less pesticide use and therefore less harm to non-target species; crops that tolerate drought or salinity can be grown where nothing grew before; and nutritional improvement, as with rice engineered to make beta-carotene.

Arguments against: genes may spread by pollen to wild relatives, creating herbicide-resistant weeds; insect populations may evolve resistance to the toxin, exactly as bacteria evolve antibiotic resistance; toxin-producing crops may harm non-target insects; farmers may become dependent on a single company for seed, which they cannot save and re-sow; long-term effects on human health are not fully known, though no harm has been demonstrated; and some object to moving genes between species in principle.

Common mistakes

Related CIE 9700 Biology topics

Browse all CIE 9700 Biology revision notes →