Economic Integration

Forms of economic integration

Integration is a ladder: each stage includes everything below it and adds one thing. Knowing the added feature at each rung is what the exam tests.

▶

The distinction between a free trade area and a customs union is worth holding precisely. In a free trade area, members set their own external tariffs, so goods can be imported through whichever member has the lowest tariff and then moved on tariff-free, which requires rules of origin to police. A customs union removes that problem with a common external tariff, at the cost of members losing independent trade policy.

Trade creation and trade diversion

This is the analytical heart of the topic, and the pair must be explained together.

Trade creation, a member switches from a high-cost domestic producer to a lower-cost partner producer, now that the tariff between them has gone. Production moves to the more efficient producer, so this is welfare-improving: consumers pay less and resources are used better.

Trade diversion, a member switches from a low-cost non-member producer to a higher-cost partner producer, purely because the partner is now tariff-free while the non-member still faces the external tariff. Production moves to a less efficient producer, so this is welfare-reducing. The saving to the consumer comes partly from tariff revenue the government no longer collects, which is a transfer rather than a gain.

The net welfare effect of joining a customs union depends on whether trade creation exceeds trade diversion.

That sentence is the judgement most 15-mark questions on this topic are looking for. It also means the answer is genuinely uncertain and depends on the pattern of costs, which is exactly the conditional reasoning the top band rewards.

The World Trade Organization

The WTO administers the multilateral trading system. Its roles:

• Providing the framework for negotiating trade liberalisation.
• Administering agreed rules, notably non-discrimination: the "most favoured nation" principle requires that a concession granted to one member is granted to all.
• Settling disputes between members.
• Monitoring national trade policies.

Regional trade agreements sit in tension with the WTO's non-discrimination principle: a customs union by definition discriminates in favour of members. They are permitted as an exception, but their proliferation fragments the multilateral system, a legitimate evaluative point.

Criticisms of the WTO: decisions require consensus among many members, so progress is slow; critics argue rules favour developed economies, particularly on agriculture and intellectual property; and enforcement depends on members' willingness to comply.

Monetary union

Benefits

• Elimination of transaction costs from currency conversion.
• Price transparency, making cross-border comparison easy and increasing competition.
• Exchange-rate certainty between members, encouraging trade and investment.
• Lower inflation and borrowing costs for members that previously lacked monetary credibility.

Costs

• Loss of independent monetary policy. A single central bank sets one interest rate for all members. If economies are at different points in the cycle, the rate is wrong for some, too loose for a booming member, too tight for one in recession.
• Loss of the exchange rate as an adjustment mechanism. A member that loses competitiveness can no longer depreciate. Adjustment must come through internal devaluation, falling wages and prices, which is slow and painful, and usually means high unemployment.
• Fiscal constraints, since membership typically requires limits on deficits and debt.
• Asymmetric shocks are the core problem: a shock hitting one member and not others cannot be addressed by that member's own monetary policy.

The costs are smaller where members' economies are similar, labour is mobile between them, and fiscal transfers can cushion asymmetric shocks, the conditions for an optimum currency area. Naming those conditions turns a list into a judgement.

The four conditions, stated properly, since a question on monetary union is usually asking whether they hold:

• Similar economic structures and business cycles, so a single interest rate suits everyone at once.
• Labour mobility, so workers can move from a depressed region to a growing one, which requires not just legal freedom but common languages, transferable qualifications and portable pensions.
• Capital mobility and price and wage flexibility, so adjustment can happen through markets when the exchange rate cannot do it.
• A fiscal transfer mechanism, so a central budget can support a member hit by an asymmetric shock, the role state-level transfers play within a single country.

The eurozone is the standing example, and a genuinely two-sided one. It delivered transaction-cost savings, price transparency and low borrowing costs for members that previously lacked monetary credibility. But the sovereign debt crisis exposed the missing conditions: members that lost competitiveness could not devalue, labour mobility across languages was limited, and there was no substantial central fiscal capacity, so adjustment fell on internal devaluation, with the unemployment that implies. That is the clearest available illustration of what happens when a currency area is formed without meeting the criteria for one.

Worked example

A country with a high-cost domestic textile industry joins a customs union.

Trade creation. Before joining, domestic firms produced textiles at $12 per unit behind a tariff. A partner country can produce at $9. With the internal tariff removed, consumers buy from the partner.

1. Production shifts from a $12 domestic producer to a $9 partner producer
2. resources are used more efficiently
3. consumers pay less
4. welfare rises.

Trade diversion. The same country previously imported electronics from a non-member at $8, plus a $3 tariff, so consumers paid $11 and the government collected $3. A partner produces at $10. After joining, the partner's goods are tariff-free at $10, so imports switch to the partner.

1. Consumers pay $10 rather than $11
2. but production has shifted from an $8 producer to a $10 producer
3. real resources are wasted, and the government loses $3 of tariff revenue
4. welfare falls.

Put numbers on the diversion, because the welfare loss is counter-intuitive until you do. Suppose 1,000 units of electronics are imported.

Consumers gain \$1,000. The government loses \$3,000. Net effect: −\$2,000.
And that figure equals exactly the rise in real resource cost, \$10,000 − \$8,000 = \$2,000.

The two agree because they are the same thing counted twice: the country is now devoting \$2,000 more of real resources to obtaining the same 1,000 units. Consumers paying less is not the test. Part of their saving is simply tariff revenue the government no longer collects, a transfer within the country, and the rest is more than offset by producing in the wrong place.

Judgement. Whether joining benefits this country depends on which effect dominates across all goods, which in turn depends on how competitive partners are relative to the rest of the world, and how high the external tariff is. A high common external tariff makes diversion more likely, because it excludes efficient outsiders by a wider margin.

Common exam mistakes

• Confusing a free trade area with a customs union, the common external tariff is the difference.
• Explaining trade creation without trade diversion, or vice versa. They must be weighed together.
• Claiming integration is unambiguously beneficial. The net effect depends on which effect dominates.
• Treating trade diversion as beneficial because consumers pay less, the fall in price comes partly from lost tariff revenue, and production has moved to a less efficient producer.
• Forgetting that monetary union removes both the interest rate and the exchange rate as adjustment tools.

Exam technique

Name the stage of integration precisely and say what it adds. For trade creation and diversion. Use numbers, the argument is far clearer with three costs (domestic, partner, non-member) than in prose alone.

For monetary union questions, structure around the loss of two adjustment mechanisms (monetary policy and the exchange rate) and evaluate using the optimum currency area conditions: similarity of economies, labour mobility, fiscal transfers.

Quick revision

• Ladder: PTA → free trade area → customs union → common market → monetary union → full economic union.
• Free trade area: own external tariffs. Customs union: common external tariff.
• Trade creation: switch from high-cost domestic to lower-cost partner, welfare up.
• Trade diversion: switch from low-cost non-member to higher-cost partner, welfare down.
• Net effect depends on which dominates; a high external tariff makes diversion likelier.
• WTO: negotiation, rules including non-discrimination, dispute settlement.
• Monetary union removes independent monetary policy and the exchange rate as adjustment tools.

Not the topic you were looking for? Describe what you are stuck on in your own words and we will take you to the notes that answer it.