Home / IB Economics / Elasticity of Supply (PES)
IB Economics · Microeconomics · Topic 2.6

Elasticity of Supply (PES)

IB EconomicsSL & HLFree revision notes

Contents: 9 sections

Price elasticity of supply

PES measures how responsive quantity supplied is to a change in the good's price.

PES = percentage change in quantity supplied ÷ percentage change in price

Because the supply curve slopes upward, price and quantity move in the same direction, so PES is normally positive. This is the mirror image of PED, which is negative, and a quick way to check you have not muddled the two.

ValueNameWhat it means
PES > 1ElasticProducers respond more than proportionately
PES < 1InelasticProducers respond less than proportionately
PES = 1Unit elasticProportional response
PES = 0Perfectly inelasticQuantity fixed regardless of price (vertical curve)
PES = ∞Perfectly elasticAny quantity supplied at one price (horizontal curve)
The two limiting cases side by side: perfectly elastic demand and supply are horizontal lines, because at that price buyers or sellers will take any quantity at all.
The two limiting cases side by side: perfectly elastic demand and supply are horizontal lines, because at that price buyers or sellers will take any quantity at all.OpenStax, Principles of Economics 3e, CC BY 4.0, section 5.2

Reading PES off the diagram

A useful result that examiners test directly, because it can be answered from a sketch with no calculation at all. For a straight-line supply curve:

Where the curve cutsPES
Through the originExactly 1 at every point
The price axis (positive intercept on P)Greater than 1: elastic
The quantity axis (positive intercept on Q)Less than 1: inelastic

Note this is unlike demand, where elasticity varies along a single straight line. A supply curve through the origin has PES = 1 everywhere along it, however steep it is drawn, so steepness alone does not tell you elasticity.

Key definitions

TermExam-ready definition
PESResponsiveness of quantity supplied to a change in the good's price.
Spare capacityUnused productive capability allowing output to rise quickly.
PerishabilityHow quickly a good deteriorates, limiting the ability to store it.
Momentary supplySupply immediately after a price change, before any adjustment.

Determinants of PES

Time is the dominant determinant, and it deserves its own treatment. Economists distinguish three periods:

Concept explainer · 2 minWhat actually makes supply elastic, using corn against cornflakesJason WelkerTwo goods side by side rather than a list of determinants: corn, and cornflakes made from it. Corn is a primary commodity, a raw material taken from the earth, and its supply is inelastic because production cannot be turned up quickly at any price. There is a growing season, and the land and technology are limited and expensive, so output cannot rise even 10% within a fortnight. Cornflakes are manufactured from that commodity and respond far more freely. Primary commodity against manufactured good is the comparison the determinants all reduce to.

The other determinants:

Primary commodities versus manufactured goods

This comparison is explicitly on the syllabus and appears constantly in development questions.

Primary commoditiesManufactured goods
PESLow (inelastic)Higher (elastic)
WhyLong growing or extraction periods; land is fixed; output depends on weather; crops are perishableProduction can be scaled with shifts and capacity; inputs are mobile; goods are storable

Why this matters. Primary products tend to have both inelastic supply and inelastic demand. When either curve shifts, a bad harvest, a demand shock, the adjustment falls almost entirely on price rather than quantity. The result is volatile prices and volatile incomes for primary producers.

That volatility is a serious development problem: it makes farm incomes unpredictable, makes government revenue unpredictable in commodity-dependent economies, and makes planning and investment harder. It is the standard economic justification for buffer stock schemes, price supports and diversification strategies, and it is the reason economies dependent on primary exports are urged to diversify into manufacturing.

Buffer stock schemes deserve a sentence of their own, because the mechanism is examinable. The agency sets a price band: when the market price falls towards the floor it buys and stores the surplus, and when the price rises towards the ceiling it releases stock from store. In principle this stabilises both prices and incomes. In practice the schemes have often failed, storage is expensive, perishable goods cannot be held indefinitely, and if the floor is set above the long-run equilibrium the agency accumulates stock it can never sell and eventually runs out of money. That two-sided treatment is what an evaluation question wants.

Worked example

Calculating. The price of wheat rises from \$200 to \$240 per tonne, and quantity supplied rises from 50,000 to 55,000 tonnes.

%ΔQs = 5,000 ÷ 50,000 × 100 = 10%
%ΔP = 40 ÷ 200 × 100 = 20%
PES = 10% ÷ 20% = 0.5

PES is less than 1, so supply is inelastic: farmers cannot expand output much within a growing season, because land is fixed and the crop cycle cannot be accelerated.

Interpreting. Because supply is inelastic, a rise in demand for wheat would push the price up sharply while quantity barely moved. Over several seasons, however, farmers can plant more land and PES rises, so the same demand increase produces more output and less price rise in the long run. Saying that explicitly is what turns a calculation into analysis.

Apply it to a policy. Suppose the government subsidises wheat production to raise output.

  1. With PES = 0.5, supply is inelastic
  2. the rightward shift produces a small increase in quantity and a large fall in price
  3. most of the subsidy ends up raising producers' effective revenue per tonne rather than the tonnage grown.

If the policy aim was food security through greater output; that is close to a failure, and PES is the reason. The same subsidy applied to a manufactured good with elastic supply would deliver far more extra output per dollar spent. PES is the hidden variable that decides whether a supply-side policy achieves quantity or merely price.

Common exam mistakes

Exam technique

Calculate, interpret, apply. Show the formula, substitute, compute, then state elastic or inelastic and say what it means for the market, price volatility, producer income, or the effectiveness of a policy.

PES is often the hidden variable in policy questions. When a government subsidises a good, how much output actually rises depends on PES; if supply is inelastic, most of the subsidy raises price rather than quantity. The same logic applies to any demand-side stimulus in a market with capacity constraints.

If a diagram is given rather than data, read the elasticity from where the supply curve cuts an axis, not from how steep it looks.

For evaluation, the strongest routes are the time frame (supply is more elastic in the long run, so short-run and long-run answers differ), spare capacity, and whether the elasticity estimate is reliable.

Quick revision

Check you have it

Cross-board concept practice · originally a CIE 9708 question, used here because the concept is the same. It is not IB Economics past-paper material.

Question 1

The diagram shows the supply curve of a product. The government imposes a specific indirect tax of $5 on the product. How will the price elasticity of supply of the product change?

Diagram from the Cambridge Paper 1 (AS) May/June 2020 paper, variant 2.
More questions on elasticity of supply (pes) →
What the syllabus asks for on this topicSyllabus points

Syllabus points

  • Calculate and interpret price elasticity of supply (PES).
  • Explain the determinants of PES.
  • Apply PES to primary commodities versus manufactured goods.

Related IB Economics topics

Browse all IB Economics revision notes →

Not the topic you were looking for? Describe what you are stuck on in your own words and we will take you to the notes that answer it.